Demographics details for Burnt ranch, CA vs Nashua, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burnt ranch, CA vs Nashua, NH.
Data | Burnt ranch | Nashua |
---|---|---|
Population | 228 | 91,161 |
Median Age | 45.7 years | 40.1 years |
Median Income | $55,357 | $88,766 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 7.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Nashua
- The population in Nashua is higher at 91,161, compared to 228 in Burnt ranch.
- Residents in Burnt ranch have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 40.1 years in Nashua.
- Nashua has a higher median income of $88,766, compared to $55,357 in Burnt ranch.
- In Nashua, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 36.0% in Burnt ranch.
- Burnt ranch has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 7% in Nashua.
- The unemployment rate in Burnt ranch is higher at 7.5%, compared to 2.9% in Nashua.
Demographics
Demographics Burnt ranch vs Nashua provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Burnt ranch | Nashua |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 3 |
White | 97 | 67 |
Asian | Data is updating | 8 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 13 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 9 |
American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Nashua
- In Nashua, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
- Burnt ranch has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 67% in Nashua.
- In Nashua, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Burnt ranch.
- Nashua has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Nashua at 9%, compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Burnt ranch at 3% compared to 0% in Nashua.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Burnt ranch | Nashua |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.3% |
Depression | 20.0% | 23.2% |
Smoking | 14.8% | 14.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 14.9% |
Obesity | 29.9% | 33.8% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Nashua
- More residents in Burnt ranch report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.1% in Nashua.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Nashua at 23.2% versus 20.0% in Burnt ranch.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burnt ranch at 14.8% compared to 14.7% in Nashua.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burnt ranch at 19.5% compared to 14.9% in Nashua.
- Nashua has higher obesity rates at 33.8% compared to 29.9% in Burnt ranch.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Nashua at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Burnt ranch.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Burnt ranch | Nashua |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (611) |
High School Diploma | 11.8% (27) | 14.9% (13,556) |
Less than High School | 9.6% (22) | 10.7% (9,760) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (43) | 29.4% (26,830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Nashua
- In Nashua, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Burnt ranch.
- In Nashua, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 11.8% in Burnt ranch.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Nashua at 10.7%, compared to 9.6% in Burnt ranch.
- In Nashua, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 18.9% in Burnt ranch.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.