Demographics details for Burnt ranch, CA vs Centralia, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Burnt ranch, CA vs Centralia, IL.

Data Burnt ranch Centralia
Population 228 11,931
Median Age 45.7 years 40.7 years
Median Income $55,357 $46,468
Married Families 36.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 13% 12%
Unemployment Rate 7.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Centralia

  • The population in Centralia is higher at 11,931, compared to 228 in Burnt ranch.
  • Residents in Burnt ranch have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 40.7 years in Centralia.
  • Burnt ranch has a higher median income of $55,357 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Burnt ranch at 36.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
  • Burnt ranch has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Centralia.
  • The unemployment rate in Burnt ranch is higher at 7.5%, compared to 4.5% in Centralia.

Demographics

Demographics Burnt ranch vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Burnt ranch Centralia
Black Data is updating 10
White 97 79
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 4
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian 3 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • Burnt ranch has a higher percentage of White residents at 97% compared to 79% in Centralia.
  • In Centralia, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 5%, compared to 0% in Burnt ranch.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Burnt ranch at 3% compared to 0% in Centralia.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Burnt ranch Centralia
Mental Health Not Good 16.6% 19.0%
Physical Health Not Good 11.1% 13.8%
Depression 20.0% 23.9%
Smoking 14.8% 22.7%
Binge Drinking 19.5% 16.4%
Obesity 29.9% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 22.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.6% in Burnt ranch.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 20.0% in Burnt ranch.
  • Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 14.8% in Burnt ranch.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Burnt ranch at 19.5% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
  • Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 29.9% in Burnt ranch.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 7.0% in Burnt ranch.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Burnt ranch Centralia
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.6% (72)
High School Diploma 11.8% (27) 18.8% (2,243)
Less than High School 9.6% (22) 13.7% (1,638)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.9% (43) 12.5% (1,494)

Education Levels Comparison: Burnt ranch vs Centralia

  • In Centralia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Burnt ranch.
  • In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 11.8% in Burnt ranch.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 13.7%, compared to 9.6% in Burnt ranch.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burnt ranch hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.9% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.