Demographics details for Burns, KS vs Senecaville, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burns, KS vs Senecaville, OH.
| Data | Burns | Senecaville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 237 | 415 |
| Median Age | 26.5 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $43,125 | $48,036 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Burns vs Senecaville
- The population in Senecaville is higher at 415, compared to 237 in Burns.
- The median age in Senecaville is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
- Senecaville has a higher median income of $48,036, compared to $43,125 in Burns.
- In Senecaville, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 31.0% in Burns.
- Burns has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Senecaville.
- Senecaville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.6% in Burns.
Demographics
Demographics Burns vs Senecaville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burns | Senecaville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 92 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burns vs Senecaville
- In Senecaville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Burns.
- Burns has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 89% in Senecaville.
- Both Burns and Senecaville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burns at 6% compared to 1% in Senecaville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Senecaville at 7%, compared to 2% in Burns.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burns and Senecaville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burns | Senecaville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 22.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 42.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burns vs Senecaville
- In Senecaville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 15.5% in Burns.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Senecaville at 24.5% versus 21.2% in Burns.
- Senecaville has a higher smoking rate at 22.6% compared to 17.4% in Burns.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burns at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Senecaville.
- Senecaville has higher obesity rates at 42.9% compared to 36.5% in Burns.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Senecaville at 26.0% compared to 23.0% in Burns.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burns | Senecaville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (33) | 31.3% (130) |
| Less than High School | 43.0% (102) | 19.3% (80) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.3% (15) | 5.3% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burns vs Senecaville
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Burns and Senecaville at 0.0%.
- In Senecaville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.3% compared to 13.9% in Burns.
- More residents in Burns have less than a high school education at 43.0% compared to 19.3% in Senecaville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burns hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.3% compared to 5.3% in Senecaville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.