Demographics details for Burns, KS vs Ponca city, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burns, KS vs Ponca city, OK.
| Data | Burns | Ponca city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 237 | 24,340 |
| Median Age | 26.5 years | 37.0 years |
| Median Income | $43,125 | $51,367 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Burns vs Ponca city
- The population in Ponca city is higher at 24,340, compared to 237 in Burns.
- The median age in Ponca city is higher at 37.0 years, compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
- Ponca city has a higher median income of $51,367, compared to $43,125 in Burns.
- In Ponca city, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 31.0% in Burns.
- The poverty level is higher in Ponca city at 18%, compared to 14% in Burns.
- Ponca city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 2.6% in Burns.
Demographics
Demographics Burns vs Ponca city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burns | Ponca city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 92 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 8 |
Demographics Comparison: Burns vs Ponca city
- In Ponca city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Burns.
- Burns has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 67% in Ponca city.
- In Ponca city, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Burns.
- Ponca city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 6% in Burns.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ponca city at 12%, compared to 2% in Burns.
- In Ponca city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 8%, compared to 0% in Burns.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burns | Ponca city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 27.0% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 40.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burns vs Ponca city
- In Ponca city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 15.5% in Burns.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ponca city at 27.0% versus 21.2% in Burns.
- Ponca city has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 17.4% in Burns.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burns at 19.2% compared to 14.8% in Ponca city.
- Ponca city has higher obesity rates at 40.0% compared to 36.5% in Burns.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burns at 23.0% compared to 19.0% in Ponca city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burns | Ponca city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (33) | 17.0% (4,148) |
| Less than High School | 43.0% (102) | 12.0% (2,914) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.3% (15) | 12.6% (3,069) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burns vs Ponca city
- In Ponca city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Burns.
- In Ponca city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.0% compared to 13.9% in Burns.
- More residents in Burns have less than a high school education at 43.0% compared to 12.0% in Ponca city.
- In Ponca city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 6.3% in Burns.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.