Demographics details for Burns, KS vs Harker heights, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burns, KS vs Harker heights, TX.
| Data | Burns | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 237 | 34,102 |
| Median Age | 26.5 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $43,125 | $72,258 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.6 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Burns vs Harker heights
- The population in Harker heights is higher at 34,102, compared to 237 in Burns.
- The median age in Harker heights is higher at 34.5 years, compared to 26.5 years in Burns.
- Harker heights has a higher median income of $72,258, compared to $43,125 in Burns.
- In Harker heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Burns.
- Burns has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Harker heights.
- Harker heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.6% in Burns.
Demographics
Demographics Burns vs Harker heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burns | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 28 |
| White | 92 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Burns vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 0% in Burns.
- Burns has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 36% in Harker heights.
- In Harker heights, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Burns.
- Harker heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 6% in Burns.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harker heights at 11%, compared to 2% in Burns.
- In Harker heights, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Burns.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burns | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 21.2% | 22.5% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.2% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 36.5% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burns vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.5% in Burns.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harker heights at 22.5% versus 21.2% in Burns.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burns at 17.4% compared to 15.5% in Harker heights.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burns at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in Harker heights.
- Harker heights has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 36.5% in Burns.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burns at 23.0% compared to 13.0% in Harker heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burns | Harker heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (448) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (33) | 11.6% (3,958) |
| Less than High School | 43.0% (102) | 10.3% (3,509) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.3% (15) | 18.8% (6,403) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burns vs Harker heights
- In Harker heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Burns.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burns hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 11.6% in Harker heights.
- More residents in Burns have less than a high school education at 43.0% compared to 10.3% in Harker heights.
- In Harker heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 6.3% in Burns.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.