Demographics details for Burnham, PA vs South haven, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burnham, PA vs South haven, MI.
| Data | Burnham | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,972 | 3,988 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 61.0 years |
| Median Income | $58,929 | $63,202 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Burnham vs South haven
- The population in South haven is higher at 3,988, compared to 1,972 in Burnham.
- The median age in South haven is higher at 61.0 years, compared to 41.1 years in Burnham.
- South haven has a higher median income of $63,202, compared to $58,929 in Burnham.
- In South haven, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 36.0% in Burnham.
- Burnham has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in South haven.
- The unemployment rate in Burnham is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in South haven.
Demographics
Demographics Burnham vs South haven provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burnham | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 11 |
| White | 94 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Burnham vs South haven
- In South haven, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 3% in Burnham.
- Burnham has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 74% in South haven.
- In South haven, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Burnham.
- South haven has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 0% in Burnham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South haven at 7%, compared to 3% in Burnham.
- In South haven, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Burnham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burnham | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burnham vs South haven
- More residents in Burnham report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burnham at 24.6% compared to 24.3% in South haven.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burnham at 22.4% compared to 16.4% in South haven.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burnham at 18.3% compared to 18.0% in South haven.
- South haven has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 35.5% in Burnham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in South haven at 18.0% compared to 11.0% in Burnham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burnham | South haven |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 1.2% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (535) | 16.0% (638) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (80) | 11.5% (457) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (147) | 32.1% (1,279) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burnham vs South haven
- In South haven, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Burnham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burnham hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 16.0% in South haven.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South haven at 11.5%, compared to 4.1% in Burnham.
- In South haven, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.1% compared to 7.5% in Burnham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.