Demographics details for Burnham, PA vs Lake park, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Burnham, PA vs Lake park, GA.

Data Burnham Lake park
Population 1,972 1,412
Median Age 41.1 years 28.9 years
Median Income $58,929 $36,429
Married Families 36.0% 19.0%
Poverty Level 14% 15%
Unemployment Rate 5.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Burnham vs Lake park

  • In Burnham, the population is higher at 1,972, compared to 1,412 in Lake park.
  • Residents in Burnham have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 28.9 years in Lake park.
  • Burnham has a higher median income of $58,929 compared to $36,429 in Lake park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Burnham at 36.0% compared to 19.0% in Lake park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lake park at 15%, compared to 14% in Burnham.
  • The unemployment rate in Burnham is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.5% in Lake park.

Demographics

Demographics Burnham vs Lake park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Burnham Lake park
Black 3 16
White 94 77
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 3
Two or More Races 3 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Burnham vs Lake park

  • In Lake park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 16% compared to 3% in Burnham.
  • Burnham has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 77% in Lake park.
  • In Lake park, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Burnham.
  • Lake park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Burnham.
  • Both Burnham and Lake park have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burnham and Lake park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Burnham Lake park
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 12.5%
Depression 24.6% 23.7%
Smoking 22.4% 18.4%
Binge Drinking 18.3% 15.7%
Obesity 35.5% 36.7%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Burnham vs Lake park

  • More residents in Burnham report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 17.9% in Lake park.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Burnham at 24.6% compared to 23.7% in Lake park.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Burnham at 22.4% compared to 18.4% in Lake park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Burnham at 18.3% compared to 15.7% in Lake park.
  • Lake park has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 35.5% in Burnham.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Burnham at 11.0% compared to 5.0% in Lake park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Burnham Lake park
No Schooling 0.3% (5) 0.3% (4)
High School Diploma 27.1% (535) 13.7% (193)
Less than High School 4.1% (80) 2.3% (32)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.5% (147) 4.5% (63)

Education Levels Comparison: Burnham vs Lake park

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Burnham and Lake park at 0.3%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burnham hold a high school diploma at 27.1% compared to 13.7% in Lake park.
  • More residents in Burnham have less than a high school education at 4.1% compared to 2.3% in Lake park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burnham hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.5% compared to 4.5% in Lake park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.