Demographics details for Burnham, PA vs Hydro, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burnham, PA vs Hydro, OK.
| Data | Burnham | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,972 | 898 |
| Median Age | 41.1 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $58,929 | $37,361 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Burnham vs Hydro
- In Burnham, the population is higher at 1,972, compared to 898 in Hydro.
- Residents in Burnham have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 37.3 years in Hydro.
- Burnham has a higher median income of $58,929 compared to $37,361 in Hydro.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burnham at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Hydro.
- Burnham has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Hydro.
- The unemployment rate in Burnham is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.6% in Hydro.
Demographics
Demographics Burnham vs Hydro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burnham | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 94 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Burnham vs Hydro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burnham at 3% compared to 1% in Hydro.
- Burnham has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 76% in Hydro.
- Both Burnham and Hydro have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Hydro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Burnham.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hydro at 10%, compared to 3% in Burnham.
- In Hydro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Burnham.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burnham | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 22.4% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 35.5% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burnham vs Hydro
- In Hydro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.1% in Burnham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hydro at 25.9% versus 24.6% in Burnham.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burnham at 22.4% compared to 20.2% in Hydro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burnham at 18.3% compared to 14.5% in Hydro.
- Hydro has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 35.5% in Burnham.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hydro at 34.0% compared to 11.0% in Burnham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burnham | Hydro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (5) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 27.1% (535) | 27.6% (248) |
| Less than High School | 4.1% (80) | 10.2% (92) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.5% (147) | 19.6% (176) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burnham vs Hydro
- A higher percentage of residents in Burnham have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Hydro.
- In Hydro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 27.1% in Burnham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hydro at 10.2%, compared to 4.1% in Burnham.
- In Hydro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 7.5% in Burnham.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.