Demographics details for Burlington, IA vs Woodstock, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burlington, IA vs Woodstock, MN.
Data | Burlington | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Population | 23,611 | 110 |
Median Age | 42.9 years | 33.6 years |
Median Income | $51,628 | $53,804 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 68.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Burlington vs Woodstock
- In Burlington, the population is higher at 23,611, compared to 110 in Woodstock.
- Residents in Burlington have a higher median age of 42.9 years compared to 33.6 years in Woodstock.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $53,804, compared to $51,628 in Burlington.
- In Woodstock, the percentage of married families is higher at 68.0%, compared to 36.0% in Burlington.
- Burlington has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Burlington is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.1% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Burlington vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Burlington | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | Data is updating |
White | 81 | 95 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 5 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burlington vs Woodstock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burlington at 6% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Woodstock at 95% compared to 81% in Burlington.
- The Asian population is larger in Burlington at 2% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burlington at 5% compared to 3% in Woodstock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burlington at 6% compared to 2% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burlington and Woodstock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Burlington | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 14.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 9.1% |
Depression | 22.5% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 21.4% | 17.8% |
Binge Drinking | 21.4% | 20.9% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 34.6% |
Disability Percentage | 18.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burlington vs Woodstock
- More residents in Burlington report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.4% in Woodstock.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burlington at 22.5% compared to 21.7% in Woodstock.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burlington at 21.4% compared to 17.8% in Woodstock.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burlington at 21.4% compared to 20.9% in Woodstock.
- Obesity rates are higher in Burlington at 40.0% compared to 34.6% in Woodstock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burlington at 18.0% compared to 5.0% in Woodstock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Burlington | Woodstock |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (136) | 0.9% (1) |
High School Diploma | 19.9% (4,694) | 20.0% (22) |
Less than High School | 10.2% (2,420) | 14.5% (16) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.4% (3,625) | 10.9% (12) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burlington vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Burlington.
- In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 19.9% in Burlington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 14.5%, compared to 10.2% in Burlington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burlington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 10.9% in Woodstock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.