Demographics details for Burlington, IA vs Shasta lake, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Burlington, IA vs Shasta lake, CA.

Data Burlington Shasta lake
Population 23,611 10,335
Median Age 42.9 years 38.8 years
Median Income $51,628 $54,490
Married Families 36.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 14% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 5.1

Population Comparison: Burlington vs Shasta lake

  • In Burlington, the population is higher at 23,611, compared to 10,335 in Shasta lake.
  • Residents in Burlington have a higher median age of 42.9 years compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher median income of $54,490, compared to $51,628 in Burlington.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Burlington at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
  • Burlington has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.3% in Burlington.

Demographics

Demographics Burlington vs Shasta lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Burlington Shasta lake
Black 6 Data is updating
White 81 74
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 5 12
Two or More Races 6 11
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Burlington vs Shasta lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burlington at 6% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
  • Burlington has a higher percentage of White residents at 81% compared to 74% in Shasta lake.
  • The Asian population is larger in Burlington at 2% compared to 1% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 5% in Burlington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shasta lake at 11%, compared to 6% in Burlington.
  • In Shasta lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Burlington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Burlington Shasta lake
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 19.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.5% 13.2%
Depression 22.5% 22.9%
Smoking 21.4% 17.4%
Binge Drinking 21.4% 17.5%
Obesity 40.0% 32.5%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 25.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Burlington vs Shasta lake

  • In Shasta lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.0% in Burlington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Shasta lake at 22.9% versus 22.5% in Burlington.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Burlington at 21.4% compared to 17.4% in Shasta lake.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Burlington at 21.4% compared to 17.5% in Shasta lake.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Burlington at 40.0% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 18.0% in Burlington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Burlington Shasta lake
No Schooling 0.6% (136) 0.6% (67)
High School Diploma 19.9% (4,694) 17.0% (1,759)
Less than High School 10.2% (2,420) 11.4% (1,176)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.4% (3,625) 9.2% (946)

Education Levels Comparison: Burlington vs Shasta lake

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Burlington and Shasta lake at 0.6%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burlington hold a high school diploma at 19.9% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shasta lake at 11.4%, compared to 10.2% in Burlington.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burlington hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.4% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.