Demographics details for Burleson, TX vs San rafael, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burleson, TX vs San rafael, CA.
| Data | Burleson | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,381 | 59,971 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 44.0 years |
| Median Income | $87,312 | $113,839 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Burleson vs San rafael
- The population in San rafael is higher at 59,971, compared to 53,381 in Burleson.
- The median age in San rafael is higher at 44.0 years, compared to 35.4 years in Burleson.
- San rafael has a higher median income of $113,839, compared to $87,312 in Burleson.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Burleson and San rafael at 39.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in San rafael at 9%, compared to 6% in Burleson.
- The unemployment rate in Burleson is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.6% in San rafael.
Demographics
Demographics Burleson vs San rafael provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burleson | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 66 | 49 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Burleson vs San rafael
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burleson at 5% compared to 2% in San rafael.
- Burleson has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 49% in San rafael.
- In San rafael, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Burleson.
- San rafael has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 17% in Burleson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burleson at 10% compared to 9% in San rafael.
- In San rafael, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Burleson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burleson | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 33.0% | 24.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burleson vs San rafael
- More residents in Burleson report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 14.5% in San rafael.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burleson at 23.3% compared to 17.5% in San rafael.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burleson at 15.2% compared to 11.0% in San rafael.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burleson at 19.8% compared to 16.9% in San rafael.
- Obesity rates are higher in Burleson at 33.0% compared to 24.9% in San rafael.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in San rafael at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burleson | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (389) | 2.9% (1,761) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (7,733) | 7.4% (4,459) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (3,744) | 21.6% (12,927) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (8,907) | 36.5% (21,907) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burleson vs San rafael
- In San rafael, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 0.7% in Burleson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burleson hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 7.4% in San rafael.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San rafael at 21.6%, compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
- In San rafael, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 16.7% in Burleson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.