Demographics details for Burleson, TX vs Mount juliet, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burleson, TX vs Mount juliet, TN.
| Data | Burleson | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,381 | 42,548 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 39.2 years |
| Median Income | $87,312 | $108,066 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 2.8 |
Population Comparison: Burleson vs Mount juliet
- In Burleson, the population is higher at 53,381, compared to 42,548 in Mount juliet.
- The median age in Mount juliet is higher at 39.2 years, compared to 35.4 years in Burleson.
- Mount juliet has a higher median income of $108,066, compared to $87,312 in Burleson.
- In Mount juliet, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 39.0% in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Mount juliet.
- The unemployment rate in Burleson is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.8% in Mount juliet.
Demographics
Demographics Burleson vs Mount juliet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burleson | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 7 |
| White | 66 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burleson vs Mount juliet
- In Mount juliet, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 5% in Burleson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount juliet at 79% compared to 66% in Burleson.
- In Mount juliet, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Burleson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burleson at 17% compared to 6% in Mount juliet.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burleson at 10% compared to 4% in Mount juliet.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burleson and Mount juliet at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burleson | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.0% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 33.0% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burleson vs Mount juliet
- More residents in Burleson report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.0% in Mount juliet.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mount juliet at 25.7% versus 23.3% in Burleson.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Burleson and Mount juliet at 15.2%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burleson at 19.8% compared to 16.8% in Mount juliet.
- Obesity rates are higher in Burleson at 33.0% compared to 29.9% in Mount juliet.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Burleson and Mount juliet at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burleson | Mount juliet |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (389) | 0.4% (173) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (7,733) | 10.4% (4,408) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (3,744) | 3.9% (1,653) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (8,907) | 29.4% (12,510) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burleson vs Mount juliet
- A higher percentage of residents in Burleson have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Mount juliet.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burleson hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 10.4% in Mount juliet.
- More residents in Burleson have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 3.9% in Mount juliet.
- In Mount juliet, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.4% compared to 16.7% in Burleson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.