Demographics details for Burleson, TX vs Colbert, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burleson, TX vs Colbert, OK.
Data | Burleson | Colbert |
---|---|---|
Population | 53,381 | 1,074 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 43.9 years |
Median Income | $87,312 | $53,600 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Burleson vs Colbert
- In Burleson, the population is higher at 53,381, compared to 1,074 in Colbert.
- The median age in Colbert is higher at 43.9 years, compared to 35.4 years in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher median income of $87,312 compared to $53,600 in Colbert.
- In Colbert, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 39.0% in Burleson.
- The poverty level is higher in Colbert at 15%, compared to 6% in Burleson.
- The unemployment rate in Burleson is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Colbert.
Demographics
Demographics Burleson vs Colbert provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Burleson | Colbert |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 12 |
White | 66 | 66 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 17 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Burleson vs Colbert
- In Colbert, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 5% in Burleson.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Burleson and Colbert at 66%.
- The Asian population is larger in Burleson at 2% compared to 0% in Colbert.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burleson at 17% compared to 4% in Colbert.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burleson at 10% compared to 8% in Colbert.
- In Colbert, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in Burleson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Burleson | Colbert |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.7% |
Depression | 23.3% | 25.5% |
Smoking | 15.2% | 21.6% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 33.0% | 43.2% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burleson vs Colbert
- In Colbert, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.5% in Burleson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Colbert at 25.5% versus 23.3% in Burleson.
- Colbert has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 15.2% in Burleson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burleson at 19.8% compared to 14.3% in Colbert.
- Colbert has higher obesity rates at 43.2% compared to 33.0% in Burleson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Colbert at 26.0% compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Burleson | Colbert |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (389) | 0.5% (5) |
High School Diploma | 14.5% (7,733) | 33.7% (362) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (3,744) | 31.4% (337) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (8,907) | 16.8% (180) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burleson vs Colbert
- A higher percentage of residents in Burleson have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Colbert.
- In Colbert, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 33.7% compared to 14.5% in Burleson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Colbert at 31.4%, compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
- In Colbert, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 16.7% in Burleson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.