Demographics details for Burleson, TX vs Clermont, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burleson, TX vs Clermont, FL.
| Data | Burleson | Clermont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,381 | 46,506 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $87,312 | $75,951 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Burleson vs Clermont
- In Burleson, the population is higher at 53,381, compared to 46,506 in Clermont.
- The median age in Clermont is higher at 41.7 years, compared to 35.4 years in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher median income of $87,312 compared to $75,951 in Clermont.
- In Clermont, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 39.0% in Burleson.
- The poverty level is higher in Clermont at 9%, compared to 6% in Burleson.
- The unemployment rate in Burleson is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.7% in Clermont.
Demographics
Demographics Burleson vs Clermont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burleson | Clermont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 14 |
| White | 66 | 45 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burleson vs Clermont
- In Clermont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 5% in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 45% in Clermont.
- In Clermont, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Burleson.
- Clermont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 17% in Burleson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clermont at 16%, compared to 10% in Burleson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burleson and Clermont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burleson | Clermont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 19.5% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 33.0% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burleson vs Clermont
- More residents in Burleson report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.7% in Clermont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burleson at 23.3% compared to 19.5% in Clermont.
- Clermont has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 15.2% in Burleson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burleson at 19.8% compared to 15.5% in Clermont.
- Clermont has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 33.0% in Burleson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clermont at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burleson | Clermont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (389) | 0.4% (195) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (7,733) | 12.5% (5,809) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (3,744) | 5.7% (2,631) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (8,907) | 21.9% (10,177) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burleson vs Clermont
- A higher percentage of residents in Burleson have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Clermont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burleson hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 12.5% in Clermont.
- More residents in Burleson have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 5.7% in Clermont.
- In Clermont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 16.7% in Burleson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.