Demographics details for Burleson, TX vs Centralia, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burleson, TX vs Centralia, IL.
| Data | Burleson | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 53,381 | 11,931 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 40.7 years |
| Median Income | $87,312 | $46,468 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Burleson vs Centralia
- In Burleson, the population is higher at 53,381, compared to 11,931 in Centralia.
- The median age in Centralia is higher at 40.7 years, compared to 35.4 years in Burleson.
- Burleson has a higher median income of $87,312 compared to $46,468 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burleson at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 12%, compared to 6% in Burleson.
- Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Burleson.
Demographics
Demographics Burleson vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burleson | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 10 |
| White | 66 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burleson vs Centralia
- In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 5% in Burleson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Centralia at 79% compared to 66% in Burleson.
- Both Burleson and Centralia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burleson at 17% compared to 4% in Centralia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burleson at 10% compared to 5% in Centralia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burleson and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burleson | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 33.0% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burleson vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.5% in Burleson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 23.9% versus 23.3% in Burleson.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 15.2% in Burleson.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burleson at 19.8% compared to 16.4% in Centralia.
- Centralia has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 33.0% in Burleson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 22.0% compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burleson | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (389) | 0.6% (72) |
| High School Diploma | 14.5% (7,733) | 18.8% (2,243) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (3,744) | 13.7% (1,638) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (8,907) | 12.5% (1,494) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burleson vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of residents in Burleson have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Centralia.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 14.5% in Burleson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Centralia at 13.7%, compared to 7.0% in Burleson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burleson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 12.5% in Centralia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.