Demographics details for Burkesville, KY vs Sanford, ME
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burkesville, KY vs Sanford, ME.
| Data | Burkesville | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,380 | 22,266 |
| Median Age | 51.6 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $26,563 | $71,848 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.7 |
Population Comparison: Burkesville vs Sanford
- The population in Sanford is higher at 22,266, compared to 1,380 in Burkesville.
- Residents in Burkesville have a higher median age of 51.6 years compared to 39.3 years in Sanford.
- Sanford has a higher median income of $71,848, compared to $26,563 in Burkesville.
- In Sanford, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 29.0% in Burkesville.
- Burkesville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Sanford.
- The unemployment rate in Burkesville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.7% in Sanford.
Demographics
Demographics Burkesville vs Sanford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burkesville | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 1 |
| White | 83 | 89 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burkesville vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burkesville at 11% compared to 1% in Sanford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sanford at 89% compared to 83% in Burkesville.
- In Sanford, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Burkesville.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Burkesville and Sanford at 3%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sanford at 5%, compared to 2% in Burkesville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burkesville and Sanford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burkesville | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.8% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 29.6% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 27.1% | 18.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 43.9% | 33.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 28.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burkesville vs Sanford
- More residents in Burkesville report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 18.3% in Sanford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burkesville at 29.6% compared to 25.3% in Sanford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burkesville at 27.1% compared to 18.4% in Sanford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sanford at 18.2% compared to 13.7% in Burkesville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Burkesville at 43.9% compared to 33.4% in Sanford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burkesville at 28.0% compared to 16.0% in Sanford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burkesville | Sanford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (8) | 0.4% (79) |
| High School Diploma | 32.7% (451) | 21.5% (4,797) |
| Less than High School | 35.8% (494) | 12.1% (2,692) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.2% (72) | 15.7% (3,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burkesville vs Sanford
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkesville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Sanford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkesville hold a high school diploma at 32.7% compared to 21.5% in Sanford.
- More residents in Burkesville have less than a high school education at 35.8% compared to 12.1% in Sanford.
- In Sanford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 5.2% in Burkesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.