Demographics details for Burkesville, KY vs Fountain hills, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Burkesville, KY vs Fountain hills, AZ.

Data Burkesville Fountain hills
Population 1,380 23,785
Median Age 51.6 years 60.2 years
Median Income $26,563 $100,317
Married Families 29.0% 58.0%
Poverty Level 14% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Burkesville vs Fountain hills

  • The population in Fountain hills is higher at 23,785, compared to 1,380 in Burkesville.
  • The median age in Fountain hills is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 51.6 years in Burkesville.
  • Fountain hills has a higher median income of $100,317, compared to $26,563 in Burkesville.
  • In Fountain hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 29.0% in Burkesville.
  • Burkesville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 0% in Fountain hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Burkesville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.

Demographics

Demographics Burkesville vs Fountain hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Burkesville Fountain hills
Black 11 2
White 83 89
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Burkesville vs Fountain hills

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burkesville at 11% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain hills at 89% compared to 83% in Burkesville.
  • In Fountain hills, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Burkesville.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Burkesville and Fountain hills at 3%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fountain hills at 4%, compared to 2% in Burkesville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burkesville and Fountain hills at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Burkesville Fountain hills
Mental Health Not Good 21.8% 15.1%
Physical Health Not Good 16.8% 8.0%
Depression 29.6% 19.7%
Smoking 27.1% 10.7%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 19.8%
Obesity 43.9% 26.5%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Burkesville vs Fountain hills

  • More residents in Burkesville report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 15.1% in Fountain hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Burkesville at 29.6% compared to 19.7% in Fountain hills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Burkesville at 27.1% compared to 10.7% in Fountain hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Fountain hills at 19.8% compared to 13.7% in Burkesville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Burkesville at 43.9% compared to 26.5% in Fountain hills.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Burkesville at 28.0% compared to 10.0% in Fountain hills.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Burkesville Fountain hills
No Schooling 0.6% (8) 0.4% (88)
High School Diploma 32.7% (451) 11.7% (2,782)
Less than High School 35.8% (494) 3.7% (876)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.2% (72) 42.2% (10,044)

Education Levels Comparison: Burkesville vs Fountain hills

  • A higher percentage of residents in Burkesville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Fountain hills.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burkesville hold a high school diploma at 32.7% compared to 11.7% in Fountain hills.
  • More residents in Burkesville have less than a high school education at 35.8% compared to 3.7% in Fountain hills.
  • In Fountain hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 5.2% in Burkesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.