Demographics details for Burkesville, KY vs Big bear lake, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Burkesville, KY vs Big bear lake, CA.

Data Burkesville Big bear lake
Population 1,380 5,031
Median Age 51.6 years 47.5 years
Median Income $26,563 $70,020
Married Families 29.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 14% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Burkesville vs Big bear lake

  • The population in Big bear lake is higher at 5,031, compared to 1,380 in Burkesville.
  • Residents in Burkesville have a higher median age of 51.6 years compared to 47.5 years in Big bear lake.
  • Big bear lake has a higher median income of $70,020, compared to $26,563 in Burkesville.
  • In Big bear lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 29.0% in Burkesville.
  • Burkesville has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Big bear lake.
  • Big bear lake has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Burkesville.

Demographics

Demographics Burkesville vs Big bear lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Burkesville Big bear lake
Black 11 Data is updating
White 83 50
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 3 30
Two or More Races 2 16
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Burkesville vs Big bear lake

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burkesville at 11% compared to 0% in Big bear lake.
  • Burkesville has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 50% in Big bear lake.
  • In Big bear lake, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Burkesville.
  • Big bear lake has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 3% in Burkesville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Big bear lake at 16%, compared to 2% in Burkesville.
  • In Big bear lake, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Burkesville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Burkesville Big bear lake
Mental Health Not Good 21.8% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 16.8% 12.1%
Depression 29.6% 20.5%
Smoking 27.1% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 13.7% 17.0%
Obesity 43.9% 37.0%
Disability Percentage 28.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Burkesville vs Big bear lake

  • More residents in Burkesville report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 17.4% in Big bear lake.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Burkesville at 29.6% compared to 20.5% in Big bear lake.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Burkesville at 27.1% compared to 14.1% in Big bear lake.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Big bear lake at 17.0% compared to 13.7% in Burkesville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Burkesville at 43.9% compared to 37.0% in Big bear lake.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Burkesville at 28.0% compared to 9.0% in Big bear lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Burkesville Big bear lake
No Schooling 0.6% (8) 0.7% (37)
High School Diploma 32.7% (451) 16.4% (825)
Less than High School 35.8% (494) 12.6% (634)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.2% (72) 25.7% (1,294)

Education Levels Comparison: Burkesville vs Big bear lake

  • In Big bear lake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Burkesville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burkesville hold a high school diploma at 32.7% compared to 16.4% in Big bear lake.
  • More residents in Burkesville have less than a high school education at 35.8% compared to 12.6% in Big bear lake.
  • In Big bear lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.7% compared to 5.2% in Burkesville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.