Demographics details for Burkburnett, TX vs Torrance, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burkburnett, TX vs Torrance, CA.
| Data | Burkburnett | Torrance |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,102 | 141,126 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 42.9 years |
| Median Income | $62,143 | $109,554 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Burkburnett vs Torrance
- The population in Torrance is higher at 141,126, compared to 11,102 in Burkburnett.
- The median age in Torrance is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 42.5 years in Burkburnett.
- Torrance has a higher median income of $109,554, compared to $62,143 in Burkburnett.
- In Torrance, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 44.0% in Burkburnett.
- Burkburnett has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Torrance.
- Torrance has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Burkburnett.
Demographics
Demographics Burkburnett vs Torrance provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burkburnett | Torrance |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 3 |
| White | 73 | 25 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 39 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Torrance
- In Torrance, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 2% in Burkburnett.
- Burkburnett has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 25% in Torrance.
- In Torrance, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 0% in Burkburnett.
- Torrance has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 16% in Burkburnett.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Torrance at 12%, compared to 8% in Burkburnett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burkburnett and Torrance at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burkburnett | Torrance |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 14.0% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 7.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 21.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Torrance
- More residents in Burkburnett report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 12.7% in Torrance.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burkburnett at 26.3% compared to 14.0% in Torrance.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burkburnett at 18.0% compared to 7.9% in Torrance.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burkburnett at 19.7% compared to 15.0% in Torrance.
- Obesity rates are higher in Burkburnett at 35.0% compared to 21.4% in Torrance.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burkburnett at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Torrance.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burkburnett | Torrance |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (182) | 1.1% (1,535) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (2,172) | 11.4% (16,056) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (1,543) | 5.9% (8,337) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (1,618) | 39.6% (55,843) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burkburnett vs Torrance
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.1% in Torrance.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 11.4% in Torrance.
- More residents in Burkburnett have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 5.9% in Torrance.
- In Torrance, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.6% compared to 14.6% in Burkburnett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.