Demographics details for Burkburnett, TX vs Smith center, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burkburnett, TX vs Smith center, KS.
Data | Burkburnett | Smith center |
---|---|---|
Population | 11,102 | 1,561 |
Median Age | 42.5 years | 46.6 years |
Median Income | $62,143 | $49,444 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Burkburnett vs Smith center
- In Burkburnett, the population is higher at 11,102, compared to 1,561 in Smith center.
- The median age in Smith center is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 42.5 years in Burkburnett.
- Burkburnett has a higher median income of $62,143 compared to $49,444 in Smith center.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burkburnett at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Smith center.
- The poverty level is identical in both Burkburnett and Smith center at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Burkburnett is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Smith center.
Demographics
Demographics Burkburnett vs Smith center provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Burkburnett | Smith center |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 73 | 94 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 16 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 2 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Smith center
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burkburnett at 2% compared to 1% in Smith center.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Smith center at 94% compared to 73% in Burkburnett.
- Both Burkburnett and Smith center have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burkburnett at 16% compared to 3% in Smith center.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burkburnett at 8% compared to 2% in Smith center.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Burkburnett at 1% compared to 0% in Smith center.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Burkburnett | Smith center |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 10.8% |
Depression | 26.3% | 21.7% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 19.2% |
Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 38.8% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Smith center
- More residents in Burkburnett report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 16.7% in Smith center.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burkburnett at 26.3% compared to 21.7% in Smith center.
- Smith center has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 18.0% in Burkburnett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burkburnett at 19.7% compared to 19.0% in Smith center.
- Smith center has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 35.0% in Burkburnett.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burkburnett at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Smith center.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Burkburnett | Smith center |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.6% (182) | 0.2% (3) |
High School Diploma | 19.6% (2,172) | 29.4% (459) |
Less than High School | 13.9% (1,543) | 7.6% (118) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (1,618) | 14.8% (231) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burkburnett vs Smith center
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.2% in Smith center.
- In Smith center, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.4% compared to 19.6% in Burkburnett.
- More residents in Burkburnett have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 7.6% in Smith center.
- In Smith center, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 14.6% in Burkburnett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.