Demographics details for Burkburnett, TX vs Richmond, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Burkburnett, TX vs Richmond, CA.

Data Burkburnett Richmond
Population 11,102 216,288
Median Age 42.5 years 36.0 years
Median Income $62,143 $73,000
Married Families 44.0% 40000.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 0.08

Population Comparison: Burkburnett vs Richmond

  • The population in Richmond is higher at 216,288, compared to 11,102 in Burkburnett.
  • Residents in Burkburnett have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 36.0 years in Richmond.
  • Richmond has a higher median income of $73,000, compared to $62,143 in Burkburnett.
  • In Richmond, the percentage of married families is higher at 40000.0%, compared to 44.0% in Burkburnett.
  • Burkburnett has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Richmond.
  • The unemployment rate in Burkburnett is higher at 3.5%, compared to 0.08% in Richmond.

Demographics

Demographics Burkburnett vs Richmond provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Burkburnett Richmond
Black 2 30
White 73 36
Asian Data is updating 14
Hispanic 16 20
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Richmond

  • In Richmond, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 2% in Burkburnett.
  • Burkburnett has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 36% in Richmond.
  • In Richmond, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Burkburnett.
  • Richmond has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 16% in Burkburnett.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Burkburnett at 8% compared to 5% in Richmond.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Burkburnett at 1% compared to 0% in Richmond.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Burkburnett Richmond
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 11.6% Data is updating%
Depression 26.3% Data is updating%
Smoking 18.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 19.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 35.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 20.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Richmond

  • More residents in Burkburnett report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Burkburnett at 26.3% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Burkburnett at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Burkburnett at 19.7% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Burkburnett at 35.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Burkburnett at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Burkburnett Richmond
No Schooling 1.6% (182) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 19.6% (2,172) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 13.9% (1,543) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.6% (1,618) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Burkburnett vs Richmond

  • A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
  • More residents in Burkburnett have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Richmond.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.