Demographics details for Burkburnett, TX vs Raeford, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burkburnett, TX vs Raeford, NC.
| Data | Burkburnett | Raeford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,102 | 4,529 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 38.5 years |
| Median Income | $62,143 | $38,371 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Burkburnett vs Raeford
- In Burkburnett, the population is higher at 11,102, compared to 4,529 in Raeford.
- Residents in Burkburnett have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 38.5 years in Raeford.
- Burkburnett has a higher median income of $62,143 compared to $38,371 in Raeford.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burkburnett at 44.0% compared to 27.0% in Raeford.
- The poverty level is higher in Raeford at 20%, compared to 10% in Burkburnett.
- Raeford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Burkburnett.
Demographics
Demographics Burkburnett vs Raeford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burkburnett | Raeford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 46 |
| White | 73 | 30 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 16 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 6 |
Demographics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Raeford
- In Raeford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 46% compared to 2% in Burkburnett.
- Burkburnett has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 30% in Raeford.
- Both Burkburnett and Raeford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burkburnett at 16% compared to 8% in Raeford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Raeford at 10%, compared to 8% in Burkburnett.
- In Raeford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 6%, compared to 1% in Burkburnett.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burkburnett | Raeford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 22.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 41.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Raeford
- More residents in Burkburnett report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.3% in Raeford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burkburnett at 26.3% compared to 23.7% in Raeford.
- Raeford has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 18.0% in Burkburnett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burkburnett at 19.7% compared to 14.7% in Raeford.
- Raeford has higher obesity rates at 41.7% compared to 35.0% in Burkburnett.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Raeford at 26.0% compared to 20.0% in Burkburnett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burkburnett | Raeford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (182) | 1.0% (46) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (2,172) | 19.1% (866) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (1,543) | 17.0% (768) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (1,618) | 13.2% (599) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burkburnett vs Raeford
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 1.0% in Raeford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 19.1% in Raeford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Raeford at 17.0%, compared to 13.9% in Burkburnett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 13.2% in Raeford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.