Demographics details for Burkburnett, TX vs Mukwonago, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burkburnett, TX vs Mukwonago, WI.
| Data | Burkburnett | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,102 | 8,446 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $62,143 | $91,827 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Burkburnett vs Mukwonago
- In Burkburnett, the population is higher at 11,102, compared to 8,446 in Mukwonago.
- Residents in Burkburnett have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 39.7 years in Mukwonago.
- Mukwonago has a higher median income of $91,827, compared to $62,143 in Burkburnett.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Burkburnett and Mukwonago at 44.0%.
- Burkburnett has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Mukwonago.
- The unemployment rate in Burkburnett is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.4% in Mukwonago.
Demographics
Demographics Burkburnett vs Mukwonago provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burkburnett | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Mukwonago
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burkburnett at 2% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mukwonago at 82% compared to 73% in Burkburnett.
- In Mukwonago, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Burkburnett.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burkburnett at 16% compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burkburnett at 8% compared to 7% in Mukwonago.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Burkburnett at 1% compared to 0% in Mukwonago.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burkburnett | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 25.2% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 35.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Mukwonago
- More residents in Burkburnett report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burkburnett at 26.3% compared to 21.2% in Mukwonago.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burkburnett at 18.0% compared to 13.8% in Mukwonago.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mukwonago at 25.2% compared to 19.7% in Burkburnett.
- Mukwonago has higher obesity rates at 35.3% compared to 35.0% in Burkburnett.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burkburnett at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Mukwonago.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burkburnett | Mukwonago |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (182) | 0.6% (48) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (2,172) | 17.0% (1,435) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (1,543) | 4.7% (394) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (1,618) | 25.3% (2,138) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burkburnett vs Mukwonago
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in Mukwonago.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett hold a high school diploma at 19.6% compared to 17.0% in Mukwonago.
- More residents in Burkburnett have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 4.7% in Mukwonago.
- In Mukwonago, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 14.6% in Burkburnett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.