Demographics details for Burkburnett, TX vs Jemison, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burkburnett, TX vs Jemison, AL.
| Data | Burkburnett | Jemison |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,102 | 2,780 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 36.0 years |
| Median Income | $62,143 | $62,907 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Burkburnett vs Jemison
- In Burkburnett, the population is higher at 11,102, compared to 2,780 in Jemison.
- Residents in Burkburnett have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 36.0 years in Jemison.
- Jemison has a higher median income of $62,907, compared to $62,143 in Burkburnett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burkburnett at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Jemison.
- The poverty level is higher in Jemison at 11%, compared to 10% in Burkburnett.
- Jemison has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Burkburnett.
Demographics
Demographics Burkburnett vs Jemison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burkburnett | Jemison |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 22 |
| White | 73 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 16 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Jemison
- In Jemison, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 2% in Burkburnett.
- Burkburnett has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 71% in Jemison.
- In Jemison, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Burkburnett.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burkburnett at 16% compared to 2% in Jemison.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burkburnett at 8% compared to 4% in Jemison.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Burkburnett at 1% compared to 0% in Jemison.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burkburnett | Jemison |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 14.3% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 23.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.7% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 35.0% | 43.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burkburnett vs Jemison
- In Jemison, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 18.6% in Burkburnett.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burkburnett at 26.3% compared to 24.3% in Jemison.
- Jemison has a higher smoking rate at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Burkburnett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burkburnett at 19.7% compared to 15.1% in Jemison.
- Jemison has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 35.0% in Burkburnett.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burkburnett at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Jemison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burkburnett | Jemison |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (182) | 0.8% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 19.6% (2,172) | 20.0% (556) |
| Less than High School | 13.9% (1,543) | 14.8% (411) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.6% (1,618) | 9.1% (252) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burkburnett vs Jemison
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Jemison.
- In Jemison, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.0% compared to 19.6% in Burkburnett.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jemison at 14.8%, compared to 13.9% in Burkburnett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burkburnett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 9.1% in Jemison.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.