Demographics details for Burien, WA vs Port clinton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burien, WA vs Port clinton, OH.
Data | Burien | Port clinton |
---|---|---|
Population | 50,806 | 5,966 |
Median Age | 39.5 years | 44.9 years |
Median Income | $84,583 | $55,534 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Burien vs Port clinton
- In Burien, the population is higher at 50,806, compared to 5,966 in Port clinton.
- The median age in Port clinton is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 39.5 years in Burien.
- Burien has a higher median income of $84,583 compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burien at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Port clinton at 12%, compared to 11% in Burien.
- The unemployment rate in Burien is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Port clinton.
Demographics
Demographics Burien vs Port clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Burien | Port clinton |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 3 |
White | 45 | 82 |
Asian | 14 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 22 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burien vs Port clinton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burien at 8% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port clinton at 82% compared to 45% in Burien.
- The Asian population is larger in Burien at 14% compared to 0% in Port clinton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burien at 22% compared to 7% in Port clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burien at 11% compared to 8% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burien and Port clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Burien | Port clinton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.6% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.5% |
Depression | 24.9% | 25.1% |
Smoking | 13.2% | 24.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 27.4% | 40.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burien vs Port clinton
- In Port clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.6% in Burien.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port clinton at 25.1% versus 24.9% in Burien.
- Port clinton has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 13.2% in Burien.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Port clinton at 17.9% compared to 16.6% in Burien.
- Port clinton has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 27.4% in Burien.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port clinton at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Burien.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Burien | Port clinton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.3% (1,189) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (6,646) | 21.7% (1,296) |
Less than High School | 19.6% (9,982) | 17.1% (1,023) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.7% (11,023) | 13.8% (825) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burien vs Port clinton
- A higher percentage of residents in Burien have no formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.0% in Port clinton.
- In Port clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 13.1% in Burien.
- More residents in Burien have less than a high school education at 19.6% compared to 17.1% in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burien hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.7% compared to 13.8% in Port clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.