Demographics details for Burbank, WA vs Wappingers falls, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Burbank, WA vs Wappingers falls, NY.

Data Burbank Wappingers falls
Population 3,383 6,064
Median Age 32.0 years 47.9 years
Median Income $84,046 $61,554
Married Families 45.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Burbank vs Wappingers falls

  • The population in Wappingers falls is higher at 6,064, compared to 3,383 in Burbank.
  • The median age in Wappingers falls is higher at 47.9 years, compared to 32.0 years in Burbank.
  • Burbank has a higher median income of $84,046 compared to $61,554 in Wappingers falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Burbank at 45.0% compared to 32.0% in Wappingers falls.
  • Burbank has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Wappingers falls.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Burbank and Wappingers falls at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Burbank vs Wappingers falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Burbank Wappingers falls
Black 2 13
White 63 61
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 23 20
Two or More Races 12 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Burbank vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 2% in Burbank.
  • Burbank has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 61% in Wappingers falls.
  • In Wappingers falls, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Burbank.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Burbank at 23% compared to 20% in Wappingers falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Burbank at 12% compared to 3% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burbank and Wappingers falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Burbank Wappingers falls
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.3% 11.9%
Depression 28.5% 22.8%
Smoking 18.1% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 17.2% 16.4%
Obesity 34.9% 34.7%
Disability Percentage 9.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Burbank vs Wappingers falls

  • More residents in Burbank report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.5% in Wappingers falls.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Burbank at 28.5% compared to 22.8% in Wappingers falls.
  • Wappingers falls has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 18.1% in Burbank.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Burbank at 17.2% compared to 16.4% in Wappingers falls.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Burbank at 34.9% compared to 34.7% in Wappingers falls.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wappingers falls at 16.0% compared to 9.0% in Burbank.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Burbank Wappingers falls
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.9% (57)
High School Diploma 21.5% (727) 18.1% (1,099)
Less than High School 8.4% (284) 24.9% (1,511)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.2% (412) 14.2% (861)

Education Levels Comparison: Burbank vs Wappingers falls

  • In Wappingers falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Burbank.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Burbank hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 18.1% in Wappingers falls.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wappingers falls at 24.9%, compared to 8.4% in Burbank.
  • In Wappingers falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 12.2% in Burbank.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.