Demographics details for Burbank, WA vs Fresno, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burbank, WA vs Fresno, CA.
| Data | Burbank | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,383 | 545,567 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 32.1 years |
| Median Income | $84,046 | $63,001 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.6 |
Population Comparison: Burbank vs Fresno
- The population in Fresno is higher at 545,567, compared to 3,383 in Burbank.
- The median age in Fresno is higher at 32.1 years, compared to 32.0 years in Burbank.
- Burbank has a higher median income of $84,046 compared to $63,001 in Fresno.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burbank at 45.0% compared to 30.0% in Fresno.
- The poverty level is higher in Fresno at 20%, compared to 10% in Burbank.
- Fresno has a higher unemployment rate at 6.6% compared to 3.5% in Burbank.
Demographics
Demographics Burbank vs Fresno provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burbank | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 7 |
| White | 63 | 10 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 14 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Burbank vs Fresno
- In Fresno, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 2% in Burbank.
- Burbank has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 10% in Fresno.
- In Fresno, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 0% in Burbank.
- Fresno has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 23% in Burbank.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fresno at 18%, compared to 12% in Burbank.
- In Fresno, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Burbank.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burbank | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 18.1% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burbank vs Fresno
- More residents in Burbank report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.7% in Fresno.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burbank at 28.5% compared to 17.6% in Fresno.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burbank at 18.1% compared to 15.5% in Fresno.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burbank at 17.2% compared to 13.7% in Fresno.
- Fresno has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 34.9% in Burbank.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fresno at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Burbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burbank | Fresno |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.8% (15,183) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (727) | 11.6% (63,519) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (284) | 22.1% (120,693) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (412) | 14.9% (81,421) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burbank vs Fresno
- In Fresno, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Burbank.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burbank hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 11.6% in Fresno.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fresno at 22.1%, compared to 8.4% in Burbank.
- In Fresno, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 12.2% in Burbank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.