Demographics details for Burbank, WA vs Fairburn, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burbank, WA vs Fairburn, GA.
| Data | Burbank | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,383 | 16,956 |
| Median Age | 32.0 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $84,046 | $67,245 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Burbank vs Fairburn
- The population in Fairburn is higher at 16,956, compared to 3,383 in Burbank.
- Residents in Burbank have a higher median age of 32.0 years compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Burbank has a higher median income of $84,046 compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Burbank at 45.0% compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Fairburn at 15%, compared to 10% in Burbank.
- Fairburn has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Burbank.
Demographics
Demographics Burbank vs Fairburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burbank | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 73 |
| White | 63 | 12 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Burbank vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 2% in Burbank.
- Burbank has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- Both Burbank and Fairburn have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burbank at 23% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burbank at 12% compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burbank and Fairburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burbank | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 28.5% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 18.1% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 33.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burbank vs Fairburn
- More residents in Burbank report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.4% in Fairburn.
- Depression is more prevalent in Burbank at 28.5% compared to 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Burbank at 18.1% compared to 15.6% in Fairburn.
- Binge drinking is more common in Burbank at 17.2% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Burbank at 34.9% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are higher in Burbank at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burbank | Fairburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 21.5% (727) | 12.3% (2,082) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (284) | 5.7% (961) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.2% (412) | 21.2% (3,591) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burbank vs Fairburn
- In Fairburn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Burbank.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burbank hold a high school diploma at 21.5% compared to 12.3% in Fairburn.
- More residents in Burbank have less than a high school education at 8.4% compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Fairburn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 12.2% in Burbank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.