Demographics details for Burbank, CA vs Rich hill, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Burbank, CA vs Rich hill, MO.
| Data | Burbank | Rich hill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 103,920 | 1,244 |
| Median Age | 39.6 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $91,455 | $43,205 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.0 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Burbank vs Rich hill
- In Burbank, the population is higher at 103,920, compared to 1,244 in Rich hill.
- The median age in Rich hill is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 39.6 years in Burbank.
- Burbank has a higher median income of $91,455 compared to $43,205 in Rich hill.
- In Rich hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 39.0% in Burbank.
- The poverty level is higher in Rich hill at 12%, compared to 11% in Burbank.
- The unemployment rate in Burbank is higher at 7.0%, compared to 4.8% in Rich hill.
Demographics
Demographics Burbank vs Rich hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Burbank | Rich hill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 46 | 91 |
| Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Burbank vs Rich hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Burbank at 3% compared to 1% in Rich hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rich hill at 91% compared to 46% in Burbank.
- The Asian population is larger in Burbank at 12% compared to 0% in Rich hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Burbank at 25% compared to 2% in Rich hill.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Burbank at 13% compared to 5% in Rich hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Burbank and Rich hill at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Burbank | Rich hill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 14.5% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 27.2% |
| Smoking | 9.8% | 25.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | 26.0% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Burbank vs Rich hill
- In Rich hill, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 14.8% in Burbank.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rich hill at 27.2% versus 16.9% in Burbank.
- Rich hill has a higher smoking rate at 25.1% compared to 9.8% in Burbank.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rich hill at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Burbank.
- Rich hill has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 26.0% in Burbank.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rich hill at 25.0% compared to 11.0% in Burbank.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Burbank | Rich hill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (1,105) | 1.4% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 10.3% (10,721) | 29.9% (372) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (10,407) | 42.6% (530) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.8% (35,079) | 7.4% (92) |
Education Levels Comparison: Burbank vs Rich hill
- In Rich hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.1% in Burbank.
- In Rich hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.9% compared to 10.3% in Burbank.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rich hill at 42.6%, compared to 10.0% in Burbank.
- A higher percentage of residents in Burbank hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.8% compared to 7.4% in Rich hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.