Demographics details for Buffalo, NY vs Young harris, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Buffalo, NY vs Young harris, GA.
Data | Buffalo | Young harris |
---|---|---|
Population | 276,486 | 810 |
Median Age | 33.9 years | 20.4 years |
Median Income | $46,184 | $27,500 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 19.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Buffalo vs Young harris
- In Buffalo, the population is higher at 276,486, compared to 810 in Young harris.
- Residents in Buffalo have a higher median age of 33.9 years compared to 20.4 years in Young harris.
- Buffalo has a higher median income of $46,184 compared to $27,500 in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Buffalo at 24.0% compared to 19.0% in Young harris.
- The poverty level is identical in both Buffalo and Young harris at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Buffalo is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Young harris.
Demographics
Demographics Buffalo vs Young harris provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Buffalo | Young harris |
---|---|---|
Black | 33 | 14 |
White | 40 | 70 |
Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Buffalo vs Young harris
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Buffalo at 33% compared to 14% in Young harris.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Young harris at 70% compared to 40% in Buffalo.
- The Asian population is larger in Buffalo at 8% compared to 0% in Young harris.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Buffalo at 12% compared to 11% in Young harris.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Buffalo at 7% compared to 3% in Young harris.
- In Young harris, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Buffalo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Buffalo | Young harris |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 12.0% |
Depression | 24.9% | 23.4% |
Smoking | 23.9% | 17.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 41.7% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Buffalo vs Young harris
- More residents in Buffalo report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Depression is more prevalent in Buffalo at 24.9% compared to 23.4% in Young harris.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Buffalo at 23.9% compared to 17.3% in Young harris.
- Binge drinking is more common in Buffalo at 17.1% compared to 16.9% in Young harris.
- Obesity rates are higher in Buffalo at 41.7% compared to 33.5% in Young harris.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Young harris at 23.0% compared to 17.0% in Buffalo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Buffalo | Young harris |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.7% (4,584) | 0.2% (2) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (38,389) | 5.7% (46) |
Less than High School | 13.4% (37,069) | 4.4% (36) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.9% (54,917) | 9.3% (75) |
Education Levels Comparison: Buffalo vs Young harris
- A higher percentage of residents in Buffalo have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.2% in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buffalo hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 5.7% in Young harris.
- More residents in Buffalo have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 4.4% in Young harris.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buffalo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 9.3% in Young harris.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.