Demographics details for Buckner, KY vs Indianola, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Buckner, KY vs Indianola, IA.
Data | Buckner | Indianola |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,658 | 16,069 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 34.7 years |
Median Income | $141,538 | $73,534 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Buckner vs Indianola
- The population in Indianola is higher at 16,069, compared to 3,658 in Buckner.
- Residents in Buckner have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 34.7 years in Indianola.
- Buckner has a higher median income of $141,538 compared to $73,534 in Indianola.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Buckner at 54.0% compared to 37.0% in Indianola.
- The poverty level is higher in Indianola at 7%, compared to 0% in Buckner.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Buckner and Indianola at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Buckner vs Indianola provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Buckner | Indianola |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 1 |
White | 84 | 91 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Buckner vs Indianola
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Buckner at 6% compared to 1% in Indianola.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Indianola at 91% compared to 84% in Buckner.
- In Indianola, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Buckner.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Buckner at 4% compared to 2% in Indianola.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Buckner at 6% compared to 4% in Indianola.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Buckner and Indianola at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Buckner | Indianola |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 9.7% |
Depression | 21.0% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 16.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 21.4% |
Obesity | 33.8% | 39.2% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Buckner vs Indianola
- In Indianola, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 14.3% in Buckner.
- Depression is more prevalent in Buckner at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Indianola.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Buckner at 17.3% compared to 16.5% in Indianola.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Indianola at 21.4% compared to 19.0% in Buckner.
- Indianola has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 33.8% in Buckner.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Indianola at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Buckner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Buckner | Indianola |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (21) | 0.3% (43) |
High School Diploma | 3.3% (121) | 14.5% (2,326) |
Less than High School | 8.7% (320) | 3.5% (566) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.6% (1,339) | 20.0% (3,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Buckner vs Indianola
- A higher percentage of residents in Buckner have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Indianola.
- In Indianola, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.5% compared to 3.3% in Buckner.
- More residents in Buckner have less than a high school education at 8.7% compared to 3.5% in Indianola.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buckner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 20.0% in Indianola.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.