Demographics details for Buchanan dam, TX vs Wichita, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Buchanan dam, TX vs Wichita, KS.
| Data | Buchanan dam | Wichita |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,274 | 396,192 |
| Median Age | 65.5 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $66,250 | $60,712 |
| Married Families | 66.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Wichita
- The population in Wichita is higher at 396,192, compared to 1,274 in Buchanan dam.
- Residents in Buchanan dam have a higher median age of 65.5 years compared to 35.4 years in Wichita.
- Buchanan dam has a higher median income of $66,250 compared to $60,712 in Wichita.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Buchanan dam at 66.0% compared to 36.0% in Wichita.
- The poverty level is higher in Wichita at 13%, compared to 8% in Buchanan dam.
- The unemployment rate in Buchanan dam is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Wichita.
Demographics
Demographics Buchanan dam vs Wichita provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Buchanan dam | Wichita |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 10 |
| White | 82 | 56 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Wichita
- In Wichita, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Buchanan dam.
- Buchanan dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 56% in Wichita.
- In Wichita, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Buchanan dam.
- Wichita has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 11% in Buchanan dam.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wichita at 10%, compared to 6% in Buchanan dam.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Buchanan dam and Wichita at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Buchanan dam | Wichita |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 20.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 40.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Wichita
- More residents in Buchanan dam report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.1% in Wichita.
- Depression is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 25.0% compared to 21.2% in Wichita.
- Wichita has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Buchanan dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Buchanan dam at 19.0% compared to 16.6% in Wichita.
- Wichita has higher obesity rates at 40.4% compared to 36.1% in Buchanan dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Buchanan dam at 26.0% compared to 15.0% in Wichita.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Buchanan dam | Wichita |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (6,509) |
| High School Diploma | 26.5% (338) | 13.5% (53,581) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (58) | 13.8% (54,534) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (296) | 20.3% (80,251) |
Education Levels Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Wichita
- In Wichita, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 13.5% in Wichita.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wichita at 13.8%, compared to 4.6% in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 20.3% in Wichita.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.