Demographics details for Buchanan dam, TX vs White swan, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Buchanan dam, TX vs White swan, WA.
| Data | Buchanan dam | White swan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,274 | 561 |
| Median Age | 65.5 years | 24.5 years |
| Median Income | $66,250 | $51,667 |
| Married Families | 66.0% | 13.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Buchanan dam vs White swan
- In Buchanan dam, the population is higher at 1,274, compared to 561 in White swan.
- Residents in Buchanan dam have a higher median age of 65.5 years compared to 24.5 years in White swan.
- Buchanan dam has a higher median income of $66,250 compared to $51,667 in White swan.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Buchanan dam at 66.0% compared to 13.0% in White swan.
- The poverty level is higher in White swan at 12%, compared to 8% in Buchanan dam.
- White swan has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 4.5% in Buchanan dam.
Demographics
Demographics Buchanan dam vs White swan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Buchanan dam | White swan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 82 | -6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 26 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 70 |
Demographics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs White swan
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Buchanan dam and White swan at 0%.
- Buchanan dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to -6% in White swan.
- Both Buchanan dam and White swan have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- White swan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 11% in Buchanan dam.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in White swan at 10%, compared to 6% in Buchanan dam.
- In White swan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 70%, compared to 1% in Buchanan dam.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Buchanan dam | White swan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 22.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 18.1% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 43.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs White swan
- In White swan, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 18.0% in Buchanan dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 25.0% compared to 24.7% in White swan.
- White swan has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 18.0% in Buchanan dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Buchanan dam at 19.0% compared to 15.8% in White swan.
- White swan has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 36.1% in Buchanan dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Buchanan dam at 26.0% compared to 21.0% in White swan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Buchanan dam | White swan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 26.5% (338) | 16.4% (92) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (58) | 24.8% (139) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (296) | 0.9% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Buchanan dam vs White swan
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Buchanan dam and White swan at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 16.4% in White swan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in White swan at 24.8%, compared to 4.6% in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 0.9% in White swan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.