Demographics details for Buchanan dam, TX vs Toccoa, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Buchanan dam, TX vs Toccoa, GA.
| Data | Buchanan dam | Toccoa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,274 | 9,146 |
| Median Age | 65.5 years | 42.3 years |
| Median Income | $66,250 | $49,860 |
| Married Families | 66.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Toccoa
- The population in Toccoa is higher at 9,146, compared to 1,274 in Buchanan dam.
- Residents in Buchanan dam have a higher median age of 65.5 years compared to 42.3 years in Toccoa.
- Buchanan dam has a higher median income of $66,250 compared to $49,860 in Toccoa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Buchanan dam at 66.0% compared to 31.0% in Toccoa.
- The poverty level is higher in Toccoa at 17%, compared to 8% in Buchanan dam.
- The unemployment rate in Buchanan dam is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Toccoa.
Demographics
Demographics Buchanan dam vs Toccoa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Buchanan dam | Toccoa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 19 |
| White | 82 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Toccoa
- In Toccoa, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 0% in Buchanan dam.
- Buchanan dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 74% in Toccoa.
- In Toccoa, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Buchanan dam.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Buchanan dam at 11% compared to 1% in Toccoa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Buchanan dam at 6% compared to 4% in Toccoa.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Buchanan dam at 1% compared to 0% in Toccoa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Buchanan dam | Toccoa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Toccoa
- In Toccoa, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.0% in Buchanan dam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 25.0% compared to 22.6% in Toccoa.
- Toccoa has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 18.0% in Buchanan dam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Buchanan dam at 19.0% compared to 15.5% in Toccoa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Buchanan dam at 36.1% compared to 34.9% in Toccoa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Buchanan dam at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Toccoa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Buchanan dam | Toccoa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (244) |
| High School Diploma | 26.5% (338) | 25.0% (2,284) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (58) | 20.6% (1,887) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (296) | 11.9% (1,090) |
Education Levels Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Toccoa
- In Toccoa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 25.0% in Toccoa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Toccoa at 20.6%, compared to 4.6% in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 11.9% in Toccoa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.