Demographics details for Buchanan dam, TX vs Pratt, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Buchanan dam, TX vs Pratt, KS.
| Data | Buchanan dam | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,274 | 9,067 |
| Median Age | 65.5 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $66,250 | $61,685 |
| Married Families | 66.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Pratt
- The population in Pratt is higher at 9,067, compared to 1,274 in Buchanan dam.
- Residents in Buchanan dam have a higher median age of 65.5 years compared to 37.6 years in Pratt.
- Buchanan dam has a higher median income of $66,250 compared to $61,685 in Pratt.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Buchanan dam at 66.0% compared to 36.0% in Pratt.
- The poverty level is higher in Pratt at 12%, compared to 8% in Buchanan dam.
- The unemployment rate in Buchanan dam is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Pratt.
Demographics
Demographics Buchanan dam vs Pratt provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Buchanan dam | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 82 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Pratt
- In Pratt, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Buchanan dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pratt at 83% compared to 82% in Buchanan dam.
- Both Buchanan dam and Pratt have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Buchanan dam at 11% compared to 8% in Pratt.
- Both Buchanan dam and Pratt have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Buchanan dam and Pratt at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Buchanan dam | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Pratt
- More residents in Buchanan dam report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.4% in Pratt.
- Depression is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 25.0% compared to 19.7% in Pratt.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 18.0% compared to 17.0% in Pratt.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Buchanan dam and Pratt at 19.0%.
- Pratt has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 36.1% in Buchanan dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Buchanan dam at 26.0% compared to 13.0% in Pratt.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Buchanan dam | Pratt |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (22) |
| High School Diploma | 26.5% (338) | 15.0% (1,362) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (58) | 10.3% (936) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (296) | 18.0% (1,634) |
Education Levels Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Pratt
- In Pratt, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 15.0% in Pratt.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pratt at 10.3%, compared to 4.6% in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 18.0% in Pratt.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.