Demographics details for Buchanan dam, TX vs Mullica hill, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Buchanan dam, TX vs Mullica hill, NJ.

Data Buchanan dam Mullica hill
Population 1,274 4,454
Median Age 65.5 years 41.0 years
Median Income $66,250 $123,265
Married Families 66.0% 46.0%
Poverty Level 8% 4%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Mullica hill

  • The population in Mullica hill is higher at 4,454, compared to 1,274 in Buchanan dam.
  • Residents in Buchanan dam have a higher median age of 65.5 years compared to 41.0 years in Mullica hill.
  • Mullica hill has a higher median income of $123,265, compared to $66,250 in Buchanan dam.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Buchanan dam at 66.0% compared to 46.0% in Mullica hill.
  • Buchanan dam has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
  • The unemployment rate in Buchanan dam is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Mullica hill.

Demographics

Demographics Buchanan dam vs Mullica hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Buchanan dam Mullica hill
Black Data is updating 11
White 82 74
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 11 4
Two or More Races 6 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Mullica hill

  • In Mullica hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in Buchanan dam.
  • Buchanan dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 74% in Mullica hill.
  • In Mullica hill, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Buchanan dam.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Buchanan dam at 11% compared to 4% in Mullica hill.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mullica hill at 7%, compared to 6% in Buchanan dam.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Buchanan dam at 1% compared to 0% in Mullica hill.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Buchanan dam Mullica hill
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 13.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 7.9%
Depression 25.0% 20.9%
Smoking 18.0% 10.3%
Binge Drinking 19.0% 20.0%
Obesity 36.1% 27.7%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Mullica hill

  • More residents in Buchanan dam report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 13.7% in Mullica hill.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 25.0% compared to 20.9% in Mullica hill.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 18.0% compared to 10.3% in Mullica hill.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mullica hill at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Buchanan dam.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Buchanan dam at 36.1% compared to 27.7% in Mullica hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Buchanan dam at 26.0% compared to 12.0% in Mullica hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Buchanan dam Mullica hill
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (33)
High School Diploma 26.5% (338) 12.9% (576)
Less than High School 4.6% (58) 5.5% (244)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.2% (296) 36.2% (1,612)

Education Levels Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Mullica hill

  • In Mullica hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Buchanan dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 12.9% in Mullica hill.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mullica hill at 5.5%, compared to 4.6% in Buchanan dam.
  • In Mullica hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.2% compared to 23.2% in Buchanan dam.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.