Demographics details for Buchanan dam, TX vs Joliet, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Buchanan dam, TX vs Joliet, IL.
| Data | Buchanan dam | Joliet |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,274 | 150,033 |
| Median Age | 65.5 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $66,250 | $84,971 |
| Married Families | 66.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Joliet
- The population in Joliet is higher at 150,033, compared to 1,274 in Buchanan dam.
- Residents in Buchanan dam have a higher median age of 65.5 years compared to 34.3 years in Joliet.
- Joliet has a higher median income of $84,971, compared to $66,250 in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Buchanan dam at 66.0% compared to 35.0% in Joliet.
- The poverty level is higher in Joliet at 12%, compared to 8% in Buchanan dam.
- Joliet has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 4.5% in Buchanan dam.
Demographics
Demographics Buchanan dam vs Joliet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Buchanan dam | Joliet |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 17 |
| White | 82 | 36 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 10 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Joliet
- In Joliet, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Buchanan dam.
- Buchanan dam has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 36% in Joliet.
- In Joliet, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Buchanan dam.
- Joliet has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 11% in Buchanan dam.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Joliet at 10%, compared to 6% in Buchanan dam.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Buchanan dam and Joliet at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Buchanan dam | Joliet |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 19.1% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Joliet
- More residents in Buchanan dam report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 15.7% in Joliet.
- Depression is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 25.0% compared to 19.1% in Joliet.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 18.0% compared to 16.9% in Joliet.
- Binge drinking is more common in Buchanan dam at 19.0% compared to 16.2% in Joliet.
- Joliet has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.1% in Buchanan dam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Buchanan dam at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in Joliet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Buchanan dam | Joliet |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (2,247) |
| High School Diploma | 26.5% (338) | 14.9% (22,362) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (58) | 17.5% (26,199) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 23.2% (296) | 15.6% (23,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Joliet
- In Joliet, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 14.9% in Joliet.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Joliet at 17.5%, compared to 4.6% in Buchanan dam.
- A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 15.6% in Joliet.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.