Demographics details for Buchanan dam, TX vs Fort scott, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Buchanan dam, TX vs Fort scott, KS.

Data Buchanan dam Fort scott
Population 1,274 7,615
Median Age 65.5 years 38.3 years
Median Income $66,250 $45,206
Married Families 66.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 8% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Fort scott

  • The population in Fort scott is higher at 7,615, compared to 1,274 in Buchanan dam.
  • Residents in Buchanan dam have a higher median age of 65.5 years compared to 38.3 years in Fort scott.
  • Buchanan dam has a higher median income of $66,250 compared to $45,206 in Fort scott.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Buchanan dam at 66.0% compared to 36.0% in Fort scott.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fort scott at 14%, compared to 8% in Buchanan dam.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Buchanan dam and Fort scott at 4.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Buchanan dam vs Fort scott provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Buchanan dam Fort scott
Black Data is updating 4
White 82 87
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 11 3
Two or More Races 6 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Fort scott

  • In Fort scott, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Buchanan dam.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort scott at 87% compared to 82% in Buchanan dam.
  • Both Buchanan dam and Fort scott have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Buchanan dam at 11% compared to 3% in Fort scott.
  • Both Buchanan dam and Fort scott have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Buchanan dam at 1% compared to 0% in Fort scott.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Buchanan dam Fort scott
Mental Health Not Good 18.0% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 11.8% 12.3%
Depression 25.0% 23.2%
Smoking 18.0% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 19.0% 16.6%
Obesity 36.1% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 26.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Fort scott

  • In Fort scott, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 18.0% in Buchanan dam.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Buchanan dam at 25.0% compared to 23.2% in Fort scott.
  • Fort scott has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 18.0% in Buchanan dam.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Buchanan dam at 19.0% compared to 16.6% in Fort scott.
  • Fort scott has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 36.1% in Buchanan dam.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Buchanan dam at 26.0% compared to 21.0% in Fort scott.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Buchanan dam Fort scott
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (30)
High School Diploma 26.5% (338) 13.7% (1,041)
Less than High School 4.6% (58) 16.9% (1,285)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 23.2% (296) 13.5% (1,029)

Education Levels Comparison: Buchanan dam vs Fort scott

  • In Fort scott, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Buchanan dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a high school diploma at 26.5% compared to 13.7% in Fort scott.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort scott at 16.9%, compared to 4.6% in Buchanan dam.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Buchanan dam hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.2% compared to 13.5% in Fort scott.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.