Demographics details for Bryantown, MD vs Port clinton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bryantown, MD vs Port clinton, OH.
Data | Bryantown | Port clinton |
---|---|---|
Population | 620 | 5,966 |
Median Age | 41.0 years | 44.9 years |
Median Income | $123,785 | $55,534 |
Married Families | 55.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Bryantown vs Port clinton
- The population in Port clinton is higher at 5,966, compared to 620 in Bryantown.
- The median age in Port clinton is higher at 44.9 years, compared to 41.0 years in Bryantown.
- Bryantown has a higher median income of $123,785 compared to $55,534 in Port clinton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bryantown at 55.0% compared to 35.0% in Port clinton.
- The poverty level is higher in Port clinton at 12%, compared to 4% in Bryantown.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Bryantown and Port clinton at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Bryantown vs Port clinton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bryantown | Port clinton |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 3 |
White | 60 | 82 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 10 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bryantown vs Port clinton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Bryantown at 20% compared to 3% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Port clinton at 82% compared to 60% in Bryantown.
- Both Bryantown and Port clinton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bryantown at 10% compared to 7% in Port clinton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Bryantown at 10% compared to 8% in Port clinton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bryantown and Port clinton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bryantown | Port clinton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 19.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 13.5% |
Depression | 17.9% | 25.1% |
Smoking | 13.3% | 24.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 39.0% | 40.7% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bryantown vs Port clinton
- In Port clinton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.4% in Bryantown.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port clinton at 25.1% versus 17.9% in Bryantown.
- Port clinton has a higher smoking rate at 24.0% compared to 13.3% in Bryantown.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bryantown at 18.1% compared to 17.9% in Port clinton.
- Port clinton has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 39.0% in Bryantown.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Bryantown and Port clinton at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bryantown | Port clinton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 4.5% (28) | 21.7% (1,296) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 17.1% (1,023) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.9% (210) | 13.8% (825) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bryantown vs Port clinton
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Bryantown and Port clinton at 0.0%.
- In Port clinton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 4.5% in Bryantown.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port clinton at 17.1%, compared to 0.0% in Bryantown.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bryantown hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 13.8% in Port clinton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.