Demographics details for Bryant, SD vs West richland, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bryant, SD vs West richland, WA.
| Data | Bryant | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 473 | 17,795 |
| Median Age | 22.8 years | 35.3 years |
| Median Income | $58,558 | $118,093 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Bryant vs West richland
- The population in West richland is higher at 17,795, compared to 473 in Bryant.
- The median age in West richland is higher at 35.3 years, compared to 22.8 years in Bryant.
- West richland has a higher median income of $118,093, compared to $58,558 in Bryant.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bryant at 56.0% compared to 40.0% in West richland.
- Bryant has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in West richland.
- West richland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.5% in Bryant.
Demographics
Demographics Bryant vs West richland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bryant | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 89 | 70 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 14 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bryant vs West richland
- In West richland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Bryant.
- Bryant has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 70% in West richland.
- In West richland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bryant.
- West richland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 11% in Bryant.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in West richland at 14%, compared to 0% in Bryant.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bryant and West richland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bryant | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 19.1% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 30.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bryant vs West richland
- In West richland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 13.2% in Bryant.
- Higher depression rates are seen in West richland at 25.4% versus 18.0% in Bryant.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bryant at 17.5% compared to 11.5% in West richland.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bryant at 20.1% compared to 19.1% in West richland.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bryant at 36.6% compared to 30.2% in West richland.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Bryant and West richland at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bryant | West richland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.4% (16) | 0.2% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 32.8% (155) | 8.9% (1,580) |
| Less than High School | 33.0% (156) | 7.2% (1,287) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (29) | 22.5% (4,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bryant vs West richland
- A higher percentage of residents in Bryant have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.2% in West richland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bryant hold a high school diploma at 32.8% compared to 8.9% in West richland.
- More residents in Bryant have less than a high school education at 33.0% compared to 7.2% in West richland.
- In West richland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 6.1% in Bryant.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.