Demographics details for Bryant, SD vs Port lavaca, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bryant, SD vs Port lavaca, TX.
| Data | Bryant | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 473 | 11,262 |
| Median Age | 22.8 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $58,558 | $58,871 |
| Married Families | 56.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Bryant vs Port lavaca
- The population in Port lavaca is higher at 11,262, compared to 473 in Bryant.
- The median age in Port lavaca is higher at 34.8 years, compared to 22.8 years in Bryant.
- Port lavaca has a higher median income of $58,871, compared to $58,558 in Bryant.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bryant at 56.0% compared to 42.0% in Port lavaca.
- The poverty level is higher in Port lavaca at 15%, compared to 10% in Bryant.
- Port lavaca has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Bryant.
Demographics
Demographics Bryant vs Port lavaca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bryant | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 89 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 64 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bryant vs Port lavaca
- In Port lavaca, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Bryant.
- Bryant has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
- In Port lavaca, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Bryant.
- Port lavaca has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 11% in Bryant.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port lavaca at 18%, compared to 0% in Bryant.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bryant and Port lavaca at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bryant | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 21.5% |
| Smoking | 17.5% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bryant vs Port lavaca
- In Port lavaca, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 13.2% in Bryant.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port lavaca at 21.5% versus 18.0% in Bryant.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Bryant and Port lavaca at 17.5%.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bryant at 20.1% compared to 16.9% in Port lavaca.
- Port lavaca has higher obesity rates at 38.4% compared to 36.6% in Bryant.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Bryant.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bryant | Port lavaca |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.4% (16) | 2.0% (230) |
| High School Diploma | 32.8% (155) | 21.3% (2,404) |
| Less than High School | 33.0% (156) | 24.2% (2,728) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (29) | 9.7% (1,091) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bryant vs Port lavaca
- A higher percentage of residents in Bryant have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 2.0% in Port lavaca.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bryant hold a high school diploma at 32.8% compared to 21.3% in Port lavaca.
- More residents in Bryant have less than a high school education at 33.0% compared to 24.2% in Port lavaca.
- In Port lavaca, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 6.1% in Bryant.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.