Demographics details for Bryant, SD vs Fort payne, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bryant, SD vs Fort payne, AL.
Data | Bryant | Fort payne |
---|---|---|
Population | 473 | 14,879 |
Median Age | 22.8 years | 39.7 years |
Median Income | $58,558 | $44,549 |
Married Families | 56.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Bryant vs Fort payne
- The population in Fort payne is higher at 14,879, compared to 473 in Bryant.
- The median age in Fort payne is higher at 39.7 years, compared to 22.8 years in Bryant.
- Bryant has a higher median income of $58,558 compared to $44,549 in Fort payne.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bryant at 56.0% compared to 38.0% in Fort payne.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort payne at 11%, compared to 10% in Bryant.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Bryant and Fort payne at 2.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Bryant vs Fort payne provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Bryant | Fort payne |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 89 | 72 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 11 | 20 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Bryant vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Bryant.
- Bryant has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 72% in Fort payne.
- Both Bryant and Fort payne have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort payne has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 11% in Bryant.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort payne at 4%, compared to 0% in Bryant.
- In Fort payne, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Bryant.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Bryant | Fort payne |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 21.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.0% | 16.1% |
Depression | 18.0% | 26.0% |
Smoking | 17.5% | 23.3% |
Binge Drinking | 20.1% | 14.3% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bryant vs Fort payne
- In Fort payne, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.2% compared to 13.2% in Bryant.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort payne at 26.0% versus 18.0% in Bryant.
- Fort payne has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 17.5% in Bryant.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bryant at 20.1% compared to 14.3% in Fort payne.
- Fort payne has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 36.6% in Bryant.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort payne at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Bryant.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Bryant | Fort payne |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 3.4% (16) | 2.7% (402) |
High School Diploma | 32.8% (155) | 14.2% (2,110) |
Less than High School | 33.0% (156) | 27.9% (4,155) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.1% (29) | 11.9% (1,767) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bryant vs Fort payne
- A higher percentage of residents in Bryant have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 2.7% in Fort payne.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bryant hold a high school diploma at 32.8% compared to 14.2% in Fort payne.
- More residents in Bryant have less than a high school education at 33.0% compared to 27.9% in Fort payne.
- In Fort payne, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 6.1% in Bryant.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.