Demographics details for Bryant, SD vs Arlington heights, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Bryant, SD vs Arlington heights, IL.

Data Bryant Arlington heights
Population 473 75,195
Median Age 22.8 years 42.8 years
Median Income $58,558 $113,502
Married Families 56.0% 49.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Bryant vs Arlington heights

  • The population in Arlington heights is higher at 75,195, compared to 473 in Bryant.
  • The median age in Arlington heights is higher at 42.8 years, compared to 22.8 years in Bryant.
  • Arlington heights has a higher median income of $113,502, compared to $58,558 in Bryant.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Bryant at 56.0% compared to 49.0% in Arlington heights.
  • Bryant has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Arlington heights.
  • Arlington heights has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 2.5% in Bryant.

Demographics

Demographics Bryant vs Arlington heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Bryant Arlington heights
Black Data is updating 3
White 89 71
Asian Data is updating 11
Hispanic 11 9
Two or More Races Data is updating 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Bryant vs Arlington heights

  • In Arlington heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Bryant.
  • Bryant has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 71% in Arlington heights.
  • In Arlington heights, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Bryant.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Bryant at 11% compared to 9% in Arlington heights.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arlington heights at 6%, compared to 0% in Bryant.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bryant and Arlington heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Bryant Arlington heights
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 12.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 7.8%
Depression 18.0% 17.3%
Smoking 17.5% 10.1%
Binge Drinking 20.1% 20.0%
Obesity 36.6% 25.4%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Bryant vs Arlington heights

  • More residents in Bryant report poor mental health at 13.2% compared to 12.3% in Arlington heights.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Bryant at 18.0% compared to 17.3% in Arlington heights.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Bryant at 17.5% compared to 10.1% in Arlington heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Bryant at 20.1% compared to 20.0% in Arlington heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Bryant at 36.6% compared to 25.4% in Arlington heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Bryant at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Arlington heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Bryant Arlington heights
No Schooling 3.4% (16) 0.4% (329)
High School Diploma 32.8% (155) 10.5% (7,880)
Less than High School 33.0% (156) 5.0% (3,740)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.1% (29) 44.1% (33,171)

Education Levels Comparison: Bryant vs Arlington heights

  • A higher percentage of residents in Bryant have no formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.4% in Arlington heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Bryant hold a high school diploma at 32.8% compared to 10.5% in Arlington heights.
  • More residents in Bryant have less than a high school education at 33.0% compared to 5.0% in Arlington heights.
  • In Arlington heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 6.1% in Bryant.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.