Demographics details for Bryan, OH vs Lancaster, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bryan, OH vs Lancaster, SC.
| Data | Bryan | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,623 | 104,577 |
| Median Age | 46.5 years | 42.2 years |
| Median Income | $51,415 | $72,186 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Bryan vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 104,577, compared to 8,623 in Bryan.
- Residents in Bryan have a higher median age of 46.5 years compared to 42.2 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $72,186, compared to $51,415 in Bryan.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 33.0% in Bryan.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 10%, compared to 9% in Bryan.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.2% in Bryan.
Demographics
Demographics Bryan vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bryan | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 18 |
| White | 92 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bryan vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 2% in Bryan.
- Bryan has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 70% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Bryan.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 4% in Bryan.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 4%, compared to 1% in Bryan.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bryan and Lancaster at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bryan | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.5% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 23.2% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 17.3% |
| Obesity | 41.8% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bryan vs Lancaster
- More residents in Bryan report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.6% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Bryan at 23.2% compared to 22.0% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Bryan at 20.5% compared to 16.9% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bryan at 18.3% compared to 17.3% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Bryan at 41.8% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Bryan at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bryan | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (45) | 0.7% (689) |
| High School Diploma | 27.7% (2,385) | 16.0% (16,691) |
| Less than High School | 16.1% (1,391) | 12.5% (13,112) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.4% (984) | 20.2% (21,156) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bryan vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Bryan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bryan hold a high school diploma at 27.7% compared to 16.0% in Lancaster.
- More residents in Bryan have less than a high school education at 16.1% compared to 12.5% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 11.4% in Bryan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.