Demographics details for Brundidge, AL vs Tehachapi, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brundidge, AL vs Tehachapi, CA.
Data | Brundidge | Tehachapi |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,034 | 12,389 |
Median Age | 49.9 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $37,627 | $62,788 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Brundidge vs Tehachapi
- The population in Tehachapi is higher at 12,389, compared to 2,034 in Brundidge.
- Residents in Brundidge have a higher median age of 49.9 years compared to 38.3 years in Tehachapi.
- Tehachapi has a higher median income of $62,788, compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Brundidge at 39.0% compared to 32.0% in Tehachapi.
- Brundidge has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 11% in Tehachapi.
- Tehachapi has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.0% in Brundidge.
Demographics
Demographics Brundidge vs Tehachapi provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brundidge | Tehachapi |
---|---|---|
Black | 67 | 7 |
White | 12 | 37 |
Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
Hispanic | 16 | 37 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Brundidge vs Tehachapi
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brundidge at 67% compared to 7% in Tehachapi.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tehachapi at 37% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
- In Tehachapi, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Brundidge.
- Tehachapi has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 16% in Brundidge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tehachapi at 12%, compared to 5% in Brundidge.
- In Tehachapi, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Brundidge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brundidge | Tehachapi |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 16.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 12.6% |
Depression | 20.7% | 17.6% |
Smoking | 23.1% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 12.2% | 18.7% |
Obesity | 45.7% | 35.2% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brundidge vs Tehachapi
- More residents in Brundidge report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 16.0% in Tehachapi.
- Depression is more prevalent in Brundidge at 20.7% compared to 17.6% in Tehachapi.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brundidge at 23.1% compared to 16.4% in Tehachapi.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tehachapi at 18.7% compared to 12.2% in Brundidge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brundidge at 45.7% compared to 35.2% in Tehachapi.
- Disability percentages are higher in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 12.0% in Tehachapi.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brundidge | Tehachapi |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (11) | 1.4% (172) |
High School Diploma | 35.9% (731) | 13.3% (1,649) |
Less than High School | 22.7% (461) | 27.7% (3,437) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (240) | 10.9% (1,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brundidge vs Tehachapi
- In Tehachapi, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.5% in Brundidge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brundidge hold a high school diploma at 35.9% compared to 13.3% in Tehachapi.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tehachapi at 27.7%, compared to 22.7% in Brundidge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brundidge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 10.9% in Tehachapi.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.