Demographics details for Brundidge, AL vs South charleston, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Brundidge, AL vs South charleston, OH.

Data Brundidge South charleston
Population 2,034 1,696
Median Age 49.9 years 42.3 years
Median Income $37,627 $47,137
Married Families 39.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 20% 7%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.2

Population Comparison: Brundidge vs South charleston

  • In Brundidge, the population is higher at 2,034, compared to 1,696 in South charleston.
  • Residents in Brundidge have a higher median age of 49.9 years compared to 42.3 years in South charleston.
  • South charleston has a higher median income of $47,137, compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Brundidge at 39.0% compared to 34.0% in South charleston.
  • Brundidge has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 7% in South charleston.
  • South charleston has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Brundidge.

Demographics

Demographics Brundidge vs South charleston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Brundidge South charleston
Black 67 4
White 12 88
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 16 3
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Brundidge vs South charleston

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brundidge at 67% compared to 4% in South charleston.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South charleston at 88% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
  • In South charleston, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Brundidge.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Brundidge at 16% compared to 3% in South charleston.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Brundidge at 5% compared to 4% in South charleston.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brundidge and South charleston at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Brundidge South charleston
Mental Health Not Good 20.5% 18.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.2% 12.6%
Depression 20.7% 25.3%
Smoking 23.1% 22.2%
Binge Drinking 12.2% 17.8%
Obesity 45.7% 42.6%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 23.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Brundidge vs South charleston

  • More residents in Brundidge report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 18.8% in South charleston.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South charleston at 25.3% versus 20.7% in Brundidge.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Brundidge at 23.1% compared to 22.2% in South charleston.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South charleston at 17.8% compared to 12.2% in Brundidge.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Brundidge at 45.7% compared to 42.6% in South charleston.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 23.0% in South charleston.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Brundidge South charleston
No Schooling 0.5% (11) 0.3% (5)
High School Diploma 35.9% (731) 26.6% (451)
Less than High School 22.7% (461) 21.6% (367)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.8% (240) 8.5% (145)

Education Levels Comparison: Brundidge vs South charleston

  • A higher percentage of residents in Brundidge have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in South charleston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Brundidge hold a high school diploma at 35.9% compared to 26.6% in South charleston.
  • More residents in Brundidge have less than a high school education at 22.7% compared to 21.6% in South charleston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Brundidge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.8% compared to 8.5% in South charleston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.