Demographics details for Brundidge, AL vs Caneyville, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brundidge, AL vs Caneyville, KY.
Data | Brundidge | Caneyville |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,034 | 529 |
Median Age | 49.9 years | 33.2 years |
Median Income | $37,627 | $42,212 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 20% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Brundidge vs Caneyville
- In Brundidge, the population is higher at 2,034, compared to 529 in Caneyville.
- Residents in Brundidge have a higher median age of 49.9 years compared to 33.2 years in Caneyville.
- Caneyville has a higher median income of $42,212, compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
- In Caneyville, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 39.0% in Brundidge.
- Brundidge has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 12% in Caneyville.
- Caneyville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Brundidge.
Demographics
Demographics Brundidge vs Caneyville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Brundidge | Caneyville |
---|---|---|
Black | 67 | Data is updating |
White | 12 | 88 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 16 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brundidge vs Caneyville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brundidge at 67% compared to 0% in Caneyville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Caneyville at 88% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
- Both Brundidge and Caneyville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brundidge at 16% compared to 1% in Caneyville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Caneyville at 11%, compared to 5% in Brundidge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brundidge and Caneyville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Brundidge | Caneyville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 22.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.9% |
Depression | 20.7% | 32.2% |
Smoking | 23.1% | 29.7% |
Binge Drinking | 12.2% | 13.7% |
Obesity | 45.7% | 41.7% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brundidge vs Caneyville
- In Caneyville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.8% compared to 20.5% in Brundidge.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Caneyville at 32.2% versus 20.7% in Brundidge.
- Caneyville has a higher smoking rate at 29.7% compared to 23.1% in Brundidge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Caneyville at 13.7% compared to 12.2% in Brundidge.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brundidge at 45.7% compared to 41.7% in Caneyville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 21.0% in Caneyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Brundidge | Caneyville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (11) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 35.9% (731) | 22.1% (117) |
Less than High School | 22.7% (461) | 20.8% (110) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (240) | 16.3% (86) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brundidge vs Caneyville
- A higher percentage of residents in Brundidge have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Caneyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Brundidge hold a high school diploma at 35.9% compared to 22.1% in Caneyville.
- More residents in Brundidge have less than a high school education at 22.7% compared to 20.8% in Caneyville.
- In Caneyville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 11.8% in Brundidge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.