Demographics details for Bruce, SD vs Arkadelphia, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Bruce, SD vs Arkadelphia, AR.
| Data | Bruce | Arkadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 215 | 10,258 |
| Median Age | 38.3 years | 23.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,833 | $37,634 |
| Married Families | 49.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Bruce vs Arkadelphia
- The population in Arkadelphia is higher at 10,258, compared to 215 in Bruce.
- Residents in Bruce have a higher median age of 38.3 years compared to 23.3 years in Arkadelphia.
- Bruce has a higher median income of $50,833 compared to $37,634 in Arkadelphia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Bruce at 49.0% compared to 23.0% in Arkadelphia.
- The poverty level is higher in Arkadelphia at 21%, compared to 5% in Bruce.
- Arkadelphia has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Bruce.
Demographics
Demographics Bruce vs Arkadelphia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Bruce | Arkadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 31 |
| White | 85 | 58 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Bruce vs Arkadelphia
- In Arkadelphia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 0% in Bruce.
- Bruce has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 58% in Arkadelphia.
- In Arkadelphia, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Bruce.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Bruce at 13% compared to 6% in Arkadelphia.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arkadelphia at 4%, compared to 2% in Bruce.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Bruce and Arkadelphia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Bruce | Arkadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.2% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.2% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 17.4% | 25.8% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 20.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.9% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 31.6% | 44.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Bruce vs Arkadelphia
- In Arkadelphia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 11.2% in Bruce.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arkadelphia at 25.8% versus 17.4% in Bruce.
- Arkadelphia has a higher smoking rate at 20.7% compared to 12.4% in Bruce.
- Binge drinking is more common in Bruce at 22.9% compared to 13.5% in Arkadelphia.
- Arkadelphia has higher obesity rates at 44.3% compared to 31.6% in Bruce.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Arkadelphia at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Bruce.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Bruce | Arkadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (25) |
| High School Diploma | 35.3% (76) | 11.3% (1,157) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (38) | 5.4% (559) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.4% (46) | 15.6% (1,598) |
Education Levels Comparison: Bruce vs Arkadelphia
- In Arkadelphia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Bruce.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bruce hold a high school diploma at 35.3% compared to 11.3% in Arkadelphia.
- More residents in Bruce have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 5.4% in Arkadelphia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Bruce hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.4% compared to 15.6% in Arkadelphia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.