Demographics details for Brownfield, TX vs Parker, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Brownfield, TX vs Parker, PA.
| Data | Brownfield | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,717 | 690 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 45.7 years |
| Median Income | $41,228 | $46,875 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Brownfield vs Parker
- In Brownfield, the population is higher at 8,717, compared to 690 in Parker.
- The median age in Parker is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 35.7 years in Brownfield.
- Parker has a higher median income of $46,875, compared to $41,228 in Brownfield.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 32.0% in Brownfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Parker at 12%, compared to 10% in Brownfield.
- Parker has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Brownfield.
Demographics
Demographics Brownfield vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Brownfield | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 2 |
| White | 45 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 65 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 30 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Brownfield vs Parker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Brownfield at 6% compared to 2% in Parker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 97% compared to 45% in Brownfield.
- Both Brownfield and Parker have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Brownfield at 65% compared to 0% in Parker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Brownfield at 30% compared to 1% in Parker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Brownfield and Parker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Brownfield | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 23.8% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 22.1% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.8% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 43.5% | 36.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Brownfield vs Parker
- More residents in Brownfield report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.9% in Parker.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Parker at 24.0% versus 23.8% in Brownfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Brownfield at 22.1% compared to 21.5% in Parker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 18.5% compared to 16.8% in Brownfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Brownfield at 43.5% compared to 36.2% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Brownfield and Parker at 16.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Brownfield | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (229) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.9% (1,651) | 32.2% (222) |
| Less than High School | 31.1% (2,709) | 16.5% (114) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.4% (475) | 8.3% (57) |
Education Levels Comparison: Brownfield vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Brownfield have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.0% in Parker.
- In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.2% compared to 18.9% in Brownfield.
- More residents in Brownfield have less than a high school education at 31.1% compared to 16.5% in Parker.
- In Parker, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 5.4% in Brownfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.