Demographics details for Broussard, LA vs Klamath falls, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Broussard, LA vs Klamath falls, OR.
| Data | Broussard | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,186 | 21,977 |
| Median Age | 32.9 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $94,912 | $46,695 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Broussard vs Klamath falls
- The population in Klamath falls is higher at 21,977, compared to 14,186 in Broussard.
- The median age in Klamath falls is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 32.9 years in Broussard.
- Broussard has a higher median income of $94,912 compared to $46,695 in Klamath falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Broussard at 41.0% compared to 31.0% in Klamath falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Klamath falls at 18%, compared to 10% in Broussard.
- Klamath falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 5.0% in Broussard.
Demographics
Demographics Broussard vs Klamath falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Broussard | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 19 | 1 |
| White | 74 | 69 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Broussard vs Klamath falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Broussard at 19% compared to 1% in Klamath falls.
- Broussard has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 69% in Klamath falls.
- Both Broussard and Klamath falls have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Klamath falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 3% in Broussard.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Klamath falls at 11%, compared to 3% in Broussard.
- In Klamath falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Broussard.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Broussard | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.9% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 26.6% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 16.9% | 19.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 20.8% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Broussard vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 16.9% in Broussard.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Klamath falls at 28.4% versus 26.6% in Broussard.
- Klamath falls has a higher smoking rate at 19.9% compared to 16.9% in Broussard.
- Binge drinking is more common in Broussard at 20.8% compared to 15.8% in Klamath falls.
- Obesity rates are higher in Broussard at 36.1% compared to 35.9% in Klamath falls.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Klamath falls at 20.0% compared to 7.0% in Broussard.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Broussard | Klamath falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (59) | 0.9% (192) |
| High School Diploma | 13.3% (1,881) | 16.0% (3,508) |
| Less than High School | 10.0% (1,414) | 15.5% (3,401) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.5% (3,043) | 14.4% (3,175) |
Education Levels Comparison: Broussard vs Klamath falls
- In Klamath falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Broussard.
- In Klamath falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 13.3% in Broussard.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Klamath falls at 15.5%, compared to 10.0% in Broussard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Broussard hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.5% compared to 14.4% in Klamath falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.